Teach us to number our days aright, that we may gain a heart of wisdom. - Psalm 90:12

Beginning of Life

Featured Article:
Justice Scalia on the Constitution, Abortion, and Assisted Suicide


U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away Saturday (February 13, 2016), believed that the role of the Court is to faithfully interpret and apply the law as it actually is—not as the Court wants it to be. Making law and policy is the job of the elected branches of government. Judges should not be legislators.

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away Saturday, believed that the role of the Court is to faithfully interpret and apply the law as it actually is—not as the Court wants it to be. Making law and policy is the job of the elected branches of government. Judges should not be legislators.

That’s why Scalia took the position he did on abortion and the Constitution. The Constitution simply does not require, as the Court mistakenly ruled in Roe v. Wade (1973), a nationwide policy of abortion on demand. In his dissenting opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which upheld the “central holding” of Roe, Scalia explained:

The issue is whether [abortion] is a liberty protected by the Constitution of the United States. I am sure it is not. I reach that conclusion … for the same reason I reach the conclusion that bigamy is not constitutionally protected—because of two simple facts: (1) the Constitution says absolutely nothing about it, and (2) the long-standing traditions of American society have permitted it to be legally proscribed.

Therefore, Scalia concluded,

“The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.”

Dissenting in Stenberg v. Carhart (2000), which struck down a state law banning partial-birth abortion, Scalia wrote:

The notion that the Constitution of the United States, designed, among other things, “to establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility … and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,” prohibits the States from simply banning this visibly brutal means of eliminating our half-born posterity is quite simply absurd.

Hodgson v. Minnesota (1990) dealt with the details of Minnesota’s parental notification law. In a complicated and divided outcome, the Court upheld the law as long as there is a judicial bypass option (Scalia would have upheld the law regardless). Scalia noted:

One will search in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the argument over these distinctions; and will find in our society’s tradition regarding abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much less any indication how a constitutional argument about them ought to be resolved. The random and unpredictable results of our consequently unchanneled individual views make it increasingly evident, Term after Term, that the tools for this job are not to be found in the lawyer’s—and hence not in the judge’s—workbox. I continue to dissent from this enterprise of devising an Abortion Code, and from the illusion that we have authority to do so.

Nor does anything in the Constitution prevent states from prohibiting assisted suicide or protecting against the dehydration and starvation of medically vulnerable patients. In Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health (1990), Scalia wrote:

American law has always accorded the State the power to prevent, by force if necessary, suicide … [T]he point at which life becomes “worthless,” and the point at which the means necessary to preserve it become “extraordinary” or “inappropriate,” are neither set forth in the Constitution nor known to the nine Justices of this Court any better than they are known to nine people picked at random from the Kansas City telephone directory.

Scalia was part of the unanimous decisions in Vacco v. Quill and Washington v. Glucksberg (1997), which held that there is no right to assisted suicide. In his dissenting opinion in Gonzales v. Oregon (2006), Scalia argued that the Attorney General is allowed, under federal law, to prevent the use of drugs in Oregon for assisted suicide:

Unless we are to repudiate a long and well-established principle of our jurisprudence, using the federal commerce power to prevent assisted suicide is unquestionably permissible. … If the term “legitimate medical purpose” has any meaning, it surely excludes the prescription of drugs to produce death.

In Roe v. Wade and subsequent decisions, the Court usurped the authority of the American people and their elected representatives to determine abortion policy—and 58 million abortions have been the result. Some people want the Court to do the same with assisted suicide.

To prevent that from happening—and to reverse Roe, allowing for greater protection for unborn children and their mothers—we desperately need more Supreme Court justices like Antonin Scalia.

Editor’s note. Paul Stark is Communications Associate for Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, NRLC’s state affiliate.


More Beginning of Life Articles



Justice Scalia on the Constitution, Abortion, and Assisted Suicide
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away Saturday (February 13, 2016), believed that the role of the Court is to faithfully interpret and apply the law as it actually...
February 24th, 2016
U.S. Abortion Statistics By Year (1973-Current)
TOTAL ABORTIONS SINCE 1973: 58,586,256 Based on numbers reported by the Guttmacher Institute 1973-2012,  with projections of 1,058,490 for 2013-15. GI estimates a possible 3 percent...
January 27th, 2016
Abortion Factsheet
What is abortion? Abortion is the expulsion or removal of an unborn child from the womb resulting in the death of that child. Generally, there are three types of abortion: spontaneous,...
January 24th, 2016
Precious Life
In a Salon website article dated Jan. 23, 2014, Mary Elizabeth Williams made a shocking acknowledgment: “Here’s the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not...
December 29th, 2015
The Things I Have Learned - A Mom's Look at the Potential of a Child with Down Syndrome
The things I have learned in the last four years are not written in any book. My son has taught me a world I never would have known without him. It is a world in which every person...
October 21st, 2015
Q&A on Abstinence/Teaching Teens about Birth Control
QUESTION: I’ve heard that teen pregnancy rates have increased. Is it time to teach our kids about birth control? ANSWER: Teaching about birth control is not the solution. Abstinence...
August 26th, 2015
Tell the Truth
Why Are We Here? Christian Life Resources (CLR) was never a ministry about convincing pro-life people to be pro-life.  Though we serve all people, we are doctrinally aligned with...
August 19th, 2015
12 Lives Every Six Minutes for 42 Years: A Perspective on the 42nd Anniversary of Legalized Abortion in the U.S.
It cost 12 lives!  When the carnage was complete and Islamic terrorists assassinated Charlie Hebdo magazine cartoonists, 12 lives were gone in 6 minutes.   The outcry of...
January 22nd, 2015
Excellent Infertility / Miscarriage Story: Matt and Amy's Journey
This is a story of infertility, and recurrent miscarriage to look at and share. The husband and wife commented, "Even if this gives hope to one person that needs to hear it, that...
September 19th, 2014
RU486 Timeline
1980 First developed in France by pharmaceutical maker Roussel Uclaf. September 1988 Approved for use in France. June 9, 1989 FDA, citing safety concerns, places import alert on RU486....
July 25th, 2014


Things to Consider

Join Us on June 11 for New Beginnings' Tiny Steps, Big Hearts 2-Mile Walk!

This is a FREE event! Every walker who raises over $20 will receive an event t-shirt!   New Beginnings - A Home for Mothers is pleased to announce its 2nd annual Tiny Steps, Big...

more...

Would a friend, relative, or acquaintance find a particular page or article useful? Fill out the form below to send it to a friend!

 
 Your Name:    
 Your Email:    
   
 Friend's Name:    
 Friend's Email:    
 Include Note:    
 Type the 2 words:
 

Please fill out the small form below to leave a comment or suggestion about the page you were just visiting.  Any and all feedback is appreciated!  Your feedback will help make our website even better.

 
 Your Name:    
 Email:    
 Phone:    
 Feedback:    
 Type the 2 words:
 
Quantcast