Wait for the LORD; be strong and take heart and wait for the LORD. - Psalm 27:14

End of Life Issues

Featured Article:
Justice Scalia on the Constitution, Abortion, and Assisted Suicide

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away Saturday (February 13, 2016), believed that the role of the Court is to faithfully interpret and apply the law as it actually is—not as the Court wants it to be. Making law and policy is the job of the elected branches of government. Judges should not be legislators.

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away Saturday, believed that the role of the Court is to faithfully interpret and apply the law as it actually is—not as the Court wants it to be. Making law and policy is the job of the elected branches of government. Judges should not be legislators.

That’s why Scalia took the position he did on abortion and the Constitution. The Constitution simply does not require, as the Court mistakenly ruled in Roe v. Wade (1973), a nationwide policy of abortion on demand. In his dissenting opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), which upheld the “central holding” of Roe, Scalia explained:

The issue is whether [abortion] is a liberty protected by the Constitution of the United States. I am sure it is not. I reach that conclusion … for the same reason I reach the conclusion that bigamy is not constitutionally protected—because of two simple facts: (1) the Constitution says absolutely nothing about it, and (2) the long-standing traditions of American society have permitted it to be legally proscribed.

Therefore, Scalia concluded,

“The permissibility of abortion, and the limitations upon it, are to be resolved like most important questions in our democracy: by citizens trying to persuade one another and then voting.”

Dissenting in Stenberg v. Carhart (2000), which struck down a state law banning partial-birth abortion, Scalia wrote:

The notion that the Constitution of the United States, designed, among other things, “to establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility … and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity,” prohibits the States from simply banning this visibly brutal means of eliminating our half-born posterity is quite simply absurd.

Hodgson v. Minnesota (1990) dealt with the details of Minnesota’s parental notification law. In a complicated and divided outcome, the Court upheld the law as long as there is a judicial bypass option (Scalia would have upheld the law regardless). Scalia noted:

One will search in vain the document we are supposed to be construing for text that provides the basis for the argument over these distinctions; and will find in our society’s tradition regarding abortion no hint that the distinctions are constitutionally relevant, much less any indication how a constitutional argument about them ought to be resolved. The random and unpredictable results of our consequently unchanneled individual views make it increasingly evident, Term after Term, that the tools for this job are not to be found in the lawyer’s—and hence not in the judge’s—workbox. I continue to dissent from this enterprise of devising an Abortion Code, and from the illusion that we have authority to do so.

Nor does anything in the Constitution prevent states from prohibiting assisted suicide or protecting against the dehydration and starvation of medically vulnerable patients. In Cruzan v. Missouri Department of Health (1990), Scalia wrote:

American law has always accorded the State the power to prevent, by force if necessary, suicide … [T]he point at which life becomes “worthless,” and the point at which the means necessary to preserve it become “extraordinary” or “inappropriate,” are neither set forth in the Constitution nor known to the nine Justices of this Court any better than they are known to nine people picked at random from the Kansas City telephone directory.

Scalia was part of the unanimous decisions in Vacco v. Quill and Washington v. Glucksberg (1997), which held that there is no right to assisted suicide. In his dissenting opinion in Gonzales v. Oregon (2006), Scalia argued that the Attorney General is allowed, under federal law, to prevent the use of drugs in Oregon for assisted suicide:

Unless we are to repudiate a long and well-established principle of our jurisprudence, using the federal commerce power to prevent assisted suicide is unquestionably permissible. … If the term “legitimate medical purpose” has any meaning, it surely excludes the prescription of drugs to produce death.

In Roe v. Wade and subsequent decisions, the Court usurped the authority of the American people and their elected representatives to determine abortion policy—and 58 million abortions have been the result. Some people want the Court to do the same with assisted suicide.

To prevent that from happening—and to reverse Roe, allowing for greater protection for unborn children and their mothers—we desperately need more Supreme Court justices like Antonin Scalia.

Editor’s note. Paul Stark is Communications Associate for Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, NRLC’s state affiliate.

More End of Life Issues Articles

Bible Study Series: The Purpose of Life - Part 1 of 3 [Questions]
Life has three purposes. This Bible study will address the first of those three purposes.Read the Following Passages: Matthew 25:1-13 - "At that time the kingdom of heaven will be like...
October 1st, 2004
Medical Decisions and the Heart
No, this is not an article about heart surgery and transplants. Rather, this article addresses the attitude of the heart when making medical decisions.
October 1st, 2004
Can We Talk? - Ways to Counsel People Nearing the End of Life
On a cold January day my father was cleaning the driveway with his snow blower. After he had finished his driveway he went over to an elderly lady's home, and cleared off her sidewalk....
October 1st, 2004
Depression That Leads to Death
True or False? 1) Most people trying to cope with depression simply don’t have strong enough faith.FALSE. People in the church may jump to this conclusion because many depressed...
October 1st, 2004
Terminology at Life's End
Christian ethics: The only value system in which motive rooted in the Christian faith is the first determinant of right and wrong.Christian medical/ethical decision making: A way of...
October 1st, 2004
A Practical Approach to End-of-Life Issues
Introduction The Christian Foundation for Life Decision-MakingBegin with Faith Establish God's Authority Over Life and Death Facing the Changed Quality of Life Understanding the Purpose...
October 1st, 2004
Care, Not Suicide: Choosing a Medical Directive That Witnesses to Your Faith
You can choose a medical directive statement that will witness to your faith.Sooner or later you will face the question, "Do you have a medical directive statement?" Or more specifically,...
October 1st, 2004
The Shape of the Lutheran Ethic - A Look at Life Issues Decision-Making
Gone are the days when your pastor's toughest medical counseling was talking to grandma about entering the nursing home. The advance of technology, the growth of the health care industry...
October 1st, 2004
Hospital Devotions - 19
Psalm 31:15 - My times are in your hands.There doesn’t seem to be a good time to be in the hospital. You have other things you need to be doing. Your life did not need this kind...
October 1st, 2004
Hospital Devotions - 3
John 20:27 - Stop doubting and believe!At times I find myself doubting God’s many promises to help in times of trouble. It’s not that his Word is unclear. It’s me....
October 1st, 2004

Things to Consider

Send in Your Individual Change for Life Coin Box Donations to Benefit New Beginnings!

Your loose change really does add up! New Beginnings relies on the generosity of caring people like you through funding opportunities (such as the “Change for Life” program)...


Would a friend, relative, or acquaintance find a particular page or article useful? Fill out the form below to send it to a friend!

 Your Name:    
 Your Email:    
 Friend's Name:    
 Friend's Email:    
 Include Note:    
 Type the 2 words:

Please fill out the small form below to leave a comment or suggestion about the page you were just visiting.  Any and all feedback is appreciated!  Your feedback will help make our website even better.

 Your Name:    
 Type the 2 words: