Did you see the July 4, 2016 issue of Time magazine? In her lead story on the potentials and pitfalls of CRISPR (the process for DNA splicing) Alice Park overlooks the first ethical problem with her own splice of illogic:
Sometime soon, [Kathy] Niakan will place a human embryo on the platform of her microscope. With one hand, she will steady the embryo – an egg that has been fertilized by a sperm but hasn’t yet begun the cell division that eventually leads to a person.
Did you catch it? “That eventually leads to a person.” When would that be?
Park does what others easily do – they ignore the biological fact that life begins at fertilization. What is going on here is the “slight of hand” that we see more and more of these days. No one wants to talk about life. That would be too revealing. Rather, the emphasis is on some nebulous concept of personhood which, by Park’s reasoning, must come at some point down the line.
Life is defined objectively. It is the biological joining of sperm and egg and a maturing process that continues from the point of fertilization to death. Ascribing “personhood” is the smoke-and-mirrors attempt to disguise the reality that with each dissection, slicing and dicing scientists terminate a life in its embryonic stage.
This degradation of human life is permeating society. Advocates for abortion finally admit that in an abortion a life is ended. They simply qualify it a life subordinate to the mother’s life and therefore expendable. Newborn life that is unwanted because of physical and/or mental challenges is increasingly becoming expendable (read up on the Groningen Protocol). With increased interest in assisted-suicide laws any life can fall under the precarious definition of “unwanted” or “useless” and therefore expendable (read up on what is happening in the Netherlands and Belgium).
There is a lot of concern that CRISPR technology is one step closer towards building a new hybrid of humans with unknown and potentially horrific repercussions down the genetic line. I suggest we deal with this first ethical problem – a life is lost in each experiment. That callousness does not bode well for the ethical decision-making anticipate down the line. When one ignores “life” and focuses rather on “personhood” the door is open to easily transition from healing maladies, to improving the species, to eliminating the unwanted.
I share in the excitement about all of the potential cures that may come from CRISPR technology. Unfortunately, Park does her own linguistic gene splicing of the first ethical quandary that is faced right now – sacrificing life in the hopes of bettering life. To dissect out “life” and to replace it with “person” in the ethical debate is bad science and bad ethics. It further opens the Pandora’s box of cheapening God’s gift of life.
More Ethics Articles
Subtle Verbal Splicing
Did you see the July 4, 2016 issue of Time magazine? In her lead story on the potentials and pitfalls of CRISPR (the process for DNA splicing) Alice Park overlooks the first ethical...
November 22nd, 2016
Fact Sheet on Vaccinations
How do immunizations work? Immunizations, or vaccinations/vaccines, increase the body’s own antibodies to a specific illness or disease. The injections contain a small amount...
August 24th, 2016
Life Worth Living
On June 22, 2015, Simona De Moor of Belgium was euthanized. She was a healthy 85 year old who saw her death as her only reprieve from the grief of losing her daughter several...
October 21st, 2015
More Alike Than Different
This speech was presented by Andrew Gerbitz in September 2012 to students of his grade school alma mater: Thank you for inviting me to visit your school to tell you about my disability....
November 14th, 2013
The Manhattan Declaration
The Manhattan Declartion was released in the fall of 2009. It can be found at: manhattandeclaration.org What Is It? The document focuses on life, marriage and religious liberty. Sanctity...
June 12th, 2013
Is An Objection on Religious Grounds Enough?
“The path of least resistance is the path of the loser.” [attributed to H.G. Wells, 1866-1946] We have done it before, and it appears we are poised to do it again. The...
August 28th, 2012
It Depends How You Say It
When the United States legalized abortion on January 22, 1973, the language changed. No longer was a little one growing and kicking in the womb referred to as a “baby.”...
May 11th, 2011
Things to Consider
Thanks for Helping on #GivingTuesday!
November 29th was #GivingTuesday, a global day dedicated to giving. People and organizations from all over the world joined together in support of charities, community organizations,...