Pray continually. - 1 Thessalonians 5:17

Stem Cell/Cloning

Featured Article:
When Working with Human DNA, It's Best to Be As Accurate As Possible

This headline was actually a sentence buried in a July 28, 2017 article on gene editing of human embryos in the United States. For those of you who are new to this topic, the prospect of editing out genetic flaws from human embryos now seems within reach thanks to the development of what is called CRISPR technology.

CRISPR stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats. For a fairly simple explanation, check out the YouTube video featuring Jennifer Doudna, a leading proponent of CRISPR technology. You can view a lengthier TED talk video with Jennifer here.

Advocates of this research have no shortage of accolades in the promise it holds in curing genetic maladies. Having grabbed the headlines and by holding out the “healing carrot” before a hungering society that longs for longevity on earth, CRISPR has become Ponce de Leon’s dream realized.

Sadly, CRISPR research is already preying upon the most defenseless in society. Current experimental efforts on human embryos always – ALWAYS – conclude with the death of the human life in embryonic form. Echoing their Chinese counterparts, CRISPR scientists always conclude their newly announced discoveries by saying the embryos were destroyed before their 14th day of development – the current legal threshold for experimentation on human life.

Citing the sloppier work of Chinese counterparts, the 7/28/17 article in SEEKER on CRISPR advancements indifferently observes, “When working with human DNA, it’s best to be as accurate as possible.”

When I read statements like this I first of all ask, “Why?” Why do these experiments have to be as accurate as possible? And presuming scientists provide a satisfactory answer I would then ask, “What assurance do we have that American CRISPR research is practicing more cautiously?”

Since the legalization of abortion there has been a steady decline in the intrinsic value of human life from its very beginning to its natural end. In the 1970s and 1980s the beginning of human life was redefined from fertilization to implantation. Under such a redefinition, various forms of birth control previously classified as abortifacient could now be called contraceptive. Artificial reproductive technology (ART) could enjoy greater insulation from criticism when it creates life in a Petri dish and then disposes of it for not being wanted or “healthy enough.”

Embryonic stem cell scientists can now break open embryos to extract pluripotent stem cells for experimentation. And CRISPR experiments can continue.

To my knowledge no protocol is currently in place to assure genetic alterations at this stage of life will not have negative repercussions for succeeding generations. Personally I can’t imagine such a reliable protocol being developed. At best a protocol would be speculative.

Nevertheless, invoking the same terminology I heard James Watson, the head of the Human Genome Project, express at an ethics conference on human genome sequencing, advocates see only good coming from this work. Such tunnel vision is alarming.

Secular science lacks an understanding of mankind’s true nature. Contrary to the physical and social Darwinists of our time, it is neither factual nor Biblical to say that mankind is morally improving. Scripture talks about increased wickedness and apathy (Matthew 24:12). A willingness to dispose of life simply because it is younger than 14 days should give an idea of where we are heading. Scientists, by the way, are now asking to increase the days permitted to experiment with embryos. Read more here.

In the Seeker article, Charlie Gard’s name was even invoked to illustrate that with successful CRISPR technology his mitochondrial defect could have been corrected prior to birth. It sounds great, but don’t forget how Charlie Gard was handled because his malady was not corrected. What will be the future of those whose defects were unintentionally amplified or worsened by failed DNA editing? What of those whose maladies were missed in the womb?

I love the promise of healing research but to plow ahead without an understanding of the selfish and self-righteous nature of sinful man does not bode well for our succeeding generations. Minimally, Christians need to engage the civic realm in responsibly overseeing this type of research to assure every precaution is taken to uphold the value of human life. As a self-governing agency I am not convinced the industry can be trusted.

~ By Rev. Robert Fleischmann

   August 7, 2017

More Stem Cell/Cloning Articles

ABC, Congress Disclose Fetal Tissue Sales
On Wednesday, March 8, 2000, the ABC news program 20/20 broadcast a story revealing the illegal sale of fetal body parts taken from aborted infants. Information about the practice,...
October 1st, 2004
BMA Opens Door on Human Reproductive Cloning
Public opposition to human reproductive cloning may be based on nothing more than an "illogical and transient fear of new technology," according to a British Medical Association discussion...
October 1st, 2004
Limitless Supply of Stem Cells Come From Body Fat
New York, NY -- In the midst of the debate over whether stem cells should be harvested form embryos, researchers have found what could be a "limitless" stem-cell supply -...
October 1st, 2004
Scientists Warn Human Cloning is Dangerous
Scientists Warn Human Cloning is Dangerous by John Travis Source: Science News Online; October 20, 2001 As scientists consider whether human cloning can be safe, the stories of two...
October 1st, 2004
Resurrecting Good Science: What's Wrong With Human Cloning
C. Ben Mitchell, Ph.D., is a member of the Center for Bioethics and Culture executive committee, editor of the journal Ethics & Medicine, and teaches bioethics and contemporary culture...
October 1st, 2004
Embryonic Stem Cell Research: People's Arguments and A Christian's Response
When People Say: "Embryonic stem cell research is necessary to further the work toward a cure for deadly diseases or injuries."All of us likely fear that one of those "deadly diseases"...
October 1st, 2004
Alternatives to Fetal Tissue Transplants in Parkinsons Disease Treatment
CLR NOTE: Despite the age of this article, it is nevertheless included on this website for your information.There are many alternatives to fetal tissue transplantation in the treatment...
October 1st, 2004
A Choice or Genetic Child Abuse?
Before explaining why he advocates human cloning, medical ethicist Gregory Pence asks people to turn off the science-fiction movie running in their minds.Dismiss the fear of breeding...
October 1st, 2004
Eugenics: Never Again
A century ago, scientists from the top universities in America began to study people's pedigrees in the hopes of creating "perfect" children. Instead, they spawned a monster: the pseudoscience...
October 1st, 2004
Stem Cell Research: Saving Life Without Destroying It
Stem Cell Research: Saving Life Without Destroying It Advocates of human embryo destruction say they must destroy life to save it. But one 16-year-old cancer survivor says it's not...
October 1st, 2004

Things to Consider

Designate Your Thrivent Choice Dollars to CLR or New Beginnings

Do you own a Thrivent financial product? If so, you can designate your "Thrivent Choice Dollars" to go to Christian Life Resources or New Beginnings - A Home for Mothers...


Would a friend, relative, or acquaintance find a particular page or article useful? Fill out the form below to send it to a friend!

 Your Name:    
 Your Email:    
 Friend's Name:    
 Friend's Email:    
 Include Note:    
 Type the 2 words:

Please fill out the small form below to leave a comment or suggestion about the page you were just visiting.  Any and all feedback is appreciated!  Your feedback will help make our website even better.

 Your Name:    
 Type the 2 words: