The Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many. - Mark 10:45

Stem Cell/Cloning

Featured Article:
When Working with Human DNA, It's Best to Be As Accurate As Possible


This headline was actually a sentence buried in a July 28, 2017 article on gene editing of human embryos in the United States. For those of you who are new to this topic, the prospect of editing out genetic flaws from human embryos now seems within reach thanks to the development of what is called CRISPR technology.

CRISPR stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats. For a fairly simple explanation, check out the YouTube video featuring Jennifer Doudna, a leading proponent of CRISPR technology. You can view a lengthier TED talk video with Jennifer here.

Advocates of this research have no shortage of accolades in the promise it holds in curing genetic maladies. Having grabbed the headlines and by holding out the “healing carrot” before a hungering society that longs for longevity on earth, CRISPR has become Ponce de Leon’s dream realized.

Sadly, CRISPR research is already preying upon the most defenseless in society. Current experimental efforts on human embryos always – ALWAYS – conclude with the death of the human life in embryonic form. Echoing their Chinese counterparts, CRISPR scientists always conclude their newly announced discoveries by saying the embryos were destroyed before their 14th day of development – the current legal threshold for experimentation on human life.

Citing the sloppier work of Chinese counterparts, the 7/28/17 article in SEEKER on CRISPR advancements indifferently observes, “When working with human DNA, it’s best to be as accurate as possible.”

When I read statements like this I first of all ask, “Why?” Why do these experiments have to be as accurate as possible? And presuming scientists provide a satisfactory answer I would then ask, “What assurance do we have that American CRISPR research is practicing more cautiously?”

Since the legalization of abortion there has been a steady decline in the intrinsic value of human life from its very beginning to its natural end. In the 1970s and 1980s the beginning of human life was redefined from fertilization to implantation. Under such a redefinition, various forms of birth control previously classified as abortifacient could now be called contraceptive. Artificial reproductive technology (ART) could enjoy greater insulation from criticism when it creates life in a Petri dish and then disposes of it for not being wanted or “healthy enough.”

Embryonic stem cell scientists can now break open embryos to extract pluripotent stem cells for experimentation. And CRISPR experiments can continue.

To my knowledge no protocol is currently in place to assure genetic alterations at this stage of life will not have negative repercussions for succeeding generations. Personally I can’t imagine such a reliable protocol being developed. At best a protocol would be speculative.

Nevertheless, invoking the same terminology I heard James Watson, the head of the Human Genome Project, express at an ethics conference on human genome sequencing, advocates see only good coming from this work. Such tunnel vision is alarming.

Secular science lacks an understanding of mankind’s true nature. Contrary to the physical and social Darwinists of our time, it is neither factual nor Biblical to say that mankind is morally improving. Scripture talks about increased wickedness and apathy (Matthew 24:12). A willingness to dispose of life simply because it is younger than 14 days should give an idea of where we are heading. Scientists, by the way, are now asking to increase the days permitted to experiment with embryos. Read more here.

In the Seeker article, Charlie Gard’s name was even invoked to illustrate that with successful CRISPR technology his mitochondrial defect could have been corrected prior to birth. It sounds great, but don’t forget how Charlie Gard was handled because his malady was not corrected. What will be the future of those whose defects were unintentionally amplified or worsened by failed DNA editing? What of those whose maladies were missed in the womb?

I love the promise of healing research but to plow ahead without an understanding of the selfish and self-righteous nature of sinful man does not bode well for our succeeding generations. Minimally, Christians need to engage the civic realm in responsibly overseeing this type of research to assure every precaution is taken to uphold the value of human life. As a self-governing agency I am not convinced the industry can be trusted.

~ By Rev. Robert Fleischmann

   August 7, 2017


More Stem Cell/Cloning Articles



Baby Parts for Sale
Millions of dollars are being made by selling fetal body parts to scientists for research. What?! Isn't that against the law? Yes, but apparently private companies have found a loophole....
October 1st, 2004
Comments on Guidelines for Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research
February 15, 2000TO: National Institutes of HealthOn behalf of Christian Life Resources, Incorporated, I am submitting this correspondence in opposition to human embryonic stem cell...
October 1st, 2004
Cloning
One can hardly send out a newsletter these days, especially in the pro-life arena, without mentioning cloning. Much ink is being spilled since Scottish scientists announced the cloning...
October 1st, 2004
Researchers Map Human DNA
Scientists have made a major advance as they have discovered the genetic sequence of an entire human chromosome. All the genetic information (DNA) for a human being is packed onto 23...
October 1st, 2004
Close the Door on Human Cloning
There's an old saw about a man whose wife comes home unexpectedly and finds him in bed with his naked mistress. "Who is that woman?" the outraged wife demands. The man, a...
October 1st, 2004
Adult Stem Cell Success: Susan Fajt's Testimony Before Senate Committee
Spinal Cord Injured Recipient of Adult Stem Cell Therapy Using Olfactory Mucosa TransplantationTestimony by Ms. Susan R. Fajt Before the Senate Commerce Subcommittee on Science, Technology,...
October 1st, 2004
PRESS RELEASE: 'Federal Funding for Stem Cell Research'
Christian Life Resources2949 N. Mayfair Rd., Suite 309Milwaukee Wl 53222For More Information, Contact CLR:Phone: 414-774-1331Fax: 414-774-1360Web Site : www.christianliferesources.comFederal...
October 1st, 2004
Mapping Out A Plan For Down Syndrome
A decade ago, any researcher who dared to suggest that Down syndrome could one day be cured was heading straight for the scientific fringe. Mainstream consensus went: Down syndrom,...
October 1st, 2004
Sex Selection Ultrasounds Done at 12 Weeks
Dr. John Stephens tells pregnant mothers if they will have a boy or a girl "and tells them early enough so they can have abortions if they choose." Couples pay Stephens $1,200 in cash...
October 1st, 2004
Statement Given To Wisconsin Legislative Committee to Ban Human Cloning
Madison WI; May 20, 2003 Thank you for the opportunity to share our perspective on pending legislation regarding SB45 and AB104 - Human Cloning Ban. I represent Christian Life Resources....
October 1st, 2004


Things to Consider

Latest Clearly Caring Article Available

Addiction! It was a typical Saturday morning. Mark slept in because he worked late. Life had settled down since he finished jail time for drug possession. He liked his second-shift...

more...

Would a friend, relative, or acquaintance find a particular page or article useful? Fill out the form below to send it to a friend!

 
 Your Name:    
 Your Email:    
   
 Friend's Name:    
 Friend's Email:    
 Include Note:    
 Type the 2 words:
 

Please fill out the small form below to leave a comment or suggestion about the page you were just visiting.  Any and all feedback is appreciated!  Your feedback will help make our website even better.

 
 Your Name:    
 Email:    
 Phone:    
 Feedback:    
 Type the 2 words:
 
Quantcast